Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Marick et al v. Tsottles et al
as 8:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Debra Marick, Anthony Michael Marick, Aden Joseph Marick and others
Defendant:
Adam Tsottles, Envirosolutions Real Property Holdings, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Christian v. Walmart, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Ikia Christian
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Solomon Foundation v. Christian Financial Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
The Solomon Foundation
Defendant:
Christian Financial Resources, Inc., Michael Kocolowski and Timothy Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mandeng v. Dossou
as 8:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
Christian Mandeng
Defendant:
William Dossou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Fotabong v. Diaz et al
as 8:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, NA and Christian Diaz
Plaintiff:
Basil Fotabong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fotabong v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Christian Diaz
Plaintiff:
Basil Fotabong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madu v. Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02923
Defendant:
Fieldstone Properties I LLC and Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christian Madu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunham et al v. Muniz et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
Alexandrea Dunham and Alycea Rivera
Defendant:
Christian Giovanni Muniz and Five Below, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jantsch et al v. Auburn University et al
as 8:2018cv01121
Plaintiff:
Susanne Jantsch and Christian Jantsch
Defendant:
Auburn University and Randal Neil Porterfield II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Rowhani et al
as 1:2017cv03719
Defendant:
Payam Rowhani, Mina Manuhehri and State Farm Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Christian B. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
