Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pierre et al v. Chang et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Giohnah Pierre, Sarita Pierre, Beverly Pierre and others
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc., Avis Rent A Car System, LLC, Felicia A. Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Chang v. Jackson et al
as 8:2022cv02208
Plaintiff:
MOLLI CHANG
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JACKSON and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Che v. Chang et al
as 8:2016cv02665
Plaintiff:
Li Che
Defendant:
Hsien Cheng Chang and Wasserman, Mancini & Chang, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman-Chang v. Eighensehr
as 1:2015cv02907
Plaintiff:
Yvette Coleman-Chang
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Eighensehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Queen v. The United States of America et al
as 8:2015cv02405
Plaintiff:
Glendora Queen
Defendant:
Ellen Chang and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Blake et al v. Yue et al
as 1:2014cv03802
Plaintiff:
Michael Blake and Kelly Blake
Defendant:
Nancy Chang Yue and Advanced Radiology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abraham v. Lee
as 8:2014cv02744
Plaintiff:
Keisha Abraham
Defendant:
Jason Chang Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Howard County General Hospital et al
as 1:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
Mary Clark
Defendant:
Howard County General Hospital, Columbia Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, LLC and Eric Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Chang-Williams v. Department of the Navy
as 8:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
Angele L. Chang-Williams
Defendant:
Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Harper v. PF Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03279
Plaintiff:
Tondilea Harper
Defendant:
PF Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
