Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Nicole Acosta, Gabriel Acosta, Marilena Acosta and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Avery et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Devon Avery, Blondel Garner, Brian Hayes and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2021cv03077
Plaintiff:
Miles Erick Hayes
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. Butler Amusements Inc
as 2:2020cv01368
Defendant:
Butler Amusements Inc
Plaintiff:
Savannah Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2018cv00452
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ellen M. McCracken, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company, Shapiro & Sutherland LLC, K. Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Jack et al v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Jack, Patrick Jack, Leslie Jack and others
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation Ltd, CBS Corporation, Honeywell International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Tamosaitis et al v. Bechtel National Inc et al
as 2:2010cv05116
Plaintiff:
Walter L Tamosaitis, Ph.D and Sandra B Tamosaitis
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc , URS Corporation, Frank Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troll v. McKay et al
as 2:2008cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jason Norman Troll
Defendant:
John McKay, Jill Otake and Annette L Hayes
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hayes v. Sedgwick Claims Management Service et al
as 2:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hayes
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Kroger, Quality Food Centers and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
