Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hester v. Kansas City Southern Railway
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Garrett L. Hester
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Covington et al v. Crane Company et al
as 3:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
Bennie Covington , William Rogers , Donald Shaw and others
Defendant:
Crane Company and John Doe Defendants 1-500
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hester v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Dustin L. Hester
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lewis et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lewis , All Plaintiffs , Pinkey Lewis and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel International, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. Takeda San Diego, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00768
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hester
Defendant:
Takeda San Diego, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. , Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester et al v. American Medical Response, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Wesley Hester and Renee Hester
Defendant:
American Medical Response, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bracken et al v. Thor Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lana Marie Bracken, Valeria Bond, M. B. and others
Defendant:
Thor Industries, Inc., MVP RV, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carroll et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carroll, Pamela Dalgo, Nicholas Dalgo and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Motor Works of Georgia, LLC, Coachmen Motor Works, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
