Cases 1 - 10 of 31
NGUYEN v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA NGUYEN
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NGUYEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
VAN BINH NGUYEN
Defendant:
KEVIN JOHNSON and PARAGON LEASING
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
NGUYEN v. MED EXPRESS MT. LEBANON et al
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
HONG M. NGUYEN
Defendant:
MED EXPRESS MT. LEBANON and ELIZABETH RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NGUYEN et al V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv03008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY NGUYEN and ROBERT NGUYEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
NGUYEN v. BLUE DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2020cv00394
Defendant:
KEVIN HUYNH, LEYTONG J. PERALTO-OLIVO, PENN TERMINALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HUE NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501
NGUYEN v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE
as 2:2019cv01959
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR NGUYEN
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Nguyen v. Richards
as 3:2018cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thu Nguyen
Defendant:
Dana Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NGUYEN et al v. THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv06208
Plaintiff:
DUY NGUYEN and AMY DWYER
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION , JOHN DOES I-X, ABC CORPORATION I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOAT PEOPLE S.O.S., INC. v. URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION et al
as 2:2016cv05486
Plaintiff:
BOAT PEOPLE S.O.S., INC.
Defendant:
URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION , NANCY NGUYEN , CATHERINE NGUYEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANTOR et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03730
Plaintiff:
HARMONY MANTOR , SARAH MARCHESE , MELISSA MARCHETTA and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
