Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crowell v. Ball et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Keon Crowell
Defendant:
Calvin Ball, Jennifer Mallo and Monica Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Eskridge v. Ball
as 8:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jeffrey Eskridge and Jeffrey Eskridge
Defendant:
Brian Craig Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Stoyanov v. Howard County Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr J. Stoyanov
Defendant:
Howard County Maryland, Calvin Ball, Deborah Baracco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Burdette v. Ball et al
as 1:2016cv03508
Plaintiff:
Hope E. Burdette
Defendant:
David Ball and Venezia Transportation Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ball v. S.M. Jackson & Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2010cv02225
Plaintiff:
Shaqunna Ball
Defendant:
S.M. Jackson & Associates, LLC, Hair World, Veeco Manufacturing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny, Chtd. v. Gehman
as 8:2007cv02345
Plaintiff:
Selzer Gurvitch Rabin & Obecny, Chtd.
Defendant:
Julian P. Gehman
ThirdParty Defendant:
Daniel A. Ball, James G. Dattaro, Neil Gurvitch and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Julian P. Gehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ball v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2007cv00533
Plaintiff:
Cathy Ball and Cathy Ball
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
