Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Ball et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ball and Patricia Ball
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ball v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Rick Layton Ball
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00583
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ADELINE PRESLEY, WILMA BALL-GREENE and PAULINE AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE v. THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00987
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NOBLE
Defendant:
THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO, Columbus City Schools, Cynthia Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. The Young Men's Christian Association of Central Ohio et al
as 2:2019cv05094
Defendant:
Columbus City Schools, Visions Unlimited Academy, Cynthia Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ball v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2019cv04797
Plaintiff:
Nadine Ball
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Ball v. Central States Trucking Co. et al
as 3:2019cv00433
Defendant:
Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company, Central States Trucking Co. and Ricardo Ortiz-Perez
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Judith Ball and Robert Ball
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02550
Plaintiff:
Erik Ball
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01823
Plaintiff:
James David Ball
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
