Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Holmes v. Becker et al
as 2:2017cv02949
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Holmes
Defendant:
James Y Becker, M. M. Caskey and Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Becker et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 6:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
Mark Becker and Donna Becker
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc , Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Stores East Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy Caro et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02319
Plaintiff:
Amy Caro , Orlando Caro , Donna Larkin and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Patricia Banks et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01811
Plaintiff:
Patricia Banks , Diane Young , Betty Becker and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Becker v. Estes Express Lines Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
Jeff Becker, Jeff Becker, Jeff Becker and others
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines Inc and Oliver Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Becker v. Estes Express Lines Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00716
Plaintiff:
Jeff Becker, Jeff Becker, Jeff Becker and others
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines Inc and Oliver Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
