Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gomez v. Woodfield Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02696
Plaintiff:
Martha Rodriguez Gomez
Defendant:
Woodfield Inc., Landon D. Bingham and Woodfield Inc. doing business as Woodfield Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bingham v. Henslee
as 3:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Joel Henslee
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wayne Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Munoz et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
as 4:2019cv01460
Plaintiff:
Sandra Reyes, A C, a Minor, M H, III, a Minor and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC, Mitsui & Company, Alice Richardson and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Refugio Reyes, Stephanie Ochoa, Danny Smith and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Juan Israel Sandoval, Andre Leon Jr. Stinton Chatman, Gabriel Tapia and others
Defendant:
NSK Corporation, NSK-AKS Precision Ball Company, UNLAUB Channel Bearing & Supply LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
Petitioner:
Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rogers v. Bingham
as 4:2019cv00748
Plaintiff:
Rjorn Rogers
Defendant:
Jashay Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bingham v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
Renee Bingham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bingham v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02107
Plaintiff:
Renee Bingham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; and member bishops severally et al
as 4:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Wallace
Defendant:
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; and member bishops severally, The Order of Carmelites, The Knights of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
