Cases 1 - 8 of 8
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2019cv12383
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 4:2019cv12383
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc., Southworth-Milton, Inc. and Southworth-Milton, Inc. doing business as Milton CAT
Plaintiff:
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc. v. Aspen Aerials, Inc.
as 1:2018cv11748
Defendant:
Aspen Aerials, Inc., Western Star Truck Sales, Inc. and Tri State Truck Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
N.E. Bridge Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. Jones Boys Insulation, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13897
Plaintiff:
Karen Drake and Larry Smith
Defendant:
Jones Boys Insulation, Inc. , Masco Corporation and Masco Contractor Services East, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Jones Boys Insulation, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Karen Drake and Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Labrador v. Industrial Contractors' Supplies, Inc.
as 1:2013cv13029
Plaintiff:
Charles Labrador
Defendant:
Industrial Contractors' Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Litowsky v. Emerson Network Power, Energy Systems, North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv30127
Plaintiff:
Jack M Litowsky
Defendant:
Emerson Network Power, Energy Systems, North America, Inc., Ametek, Inc., Gustavo Preston Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carey, et al. v. Viad Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv10530
Defendant:
Viad Corp., Viad Corp., Ametek, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Carey and Edward F Carey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Federal Cleaning Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2008cv10473
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Federal Cleaning Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
