Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Perez-Cuesta v. Rasier, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Jenee Campbell and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jaynid Perez-Cuesta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03382
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Foster Wheeler, LLC
as 1:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Campbell and Samuel E. Campbell
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC, Foster Wheeler, LLC, Foster Wheeler, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Campbell v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Campbell and Samuel E. Campbell
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Packing and Insulation Corporation, New England Insulation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Campbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
Angela F. Campbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02533
Plaintiff:
Mary Campbell and Ovid Campbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Campbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02448
Plaintiff:
Coralee Campbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Patillo et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lois Patillo, Rhonda Beaver, Larry Campbell and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Campbell et al v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Campbell, Diane L. Campbell, Daniel Ray Patterson and others
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps Inc and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
