Cases 1 - 10 of 80
CASTILLO et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
ERASMO CASTILLO and ANA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. doing business as UPS and CASEY P. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KALIHER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03494
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL KALIHER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART, US., WAL-MART FULFILLMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
ROYER v. ROBERTSON et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
MARGO L. ROYER
Defendant:
CPL MATTHEW D. ROBERTSON, OFFICER LANCE THOMPSON, CHIEF OF POLICE DUANE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES v. RAWLEY et al
as 2:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES
Defendant:
ROBERT RAWLEY, LORI EDELMAN, ANALISA SONDERGAARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SIRDAN et al v. MAN KONG LUM
as 5:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIRDAN and JACQUELINE SIRDAN
Defendant:
CASEY MAN KONG LUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KRUPNICK v. CASEY et al
as 2:2020cv04538
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR KRUPNICK
Defendant:
LINDSEY A CASEY and JOHN M CASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARON CASEY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04268
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
SHARON CASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEMONS v. FLANAGAN
as 2:2020cv00146
Defendant:
CASEY E. FLANAGAN
Plaintiff:
TINA M. CLEMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'NEAL v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 5:2020cv00321
Defendant:
KRISKA HOLDINGS LTD. and CASEY ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Piazza et al v. Young et al
as 4:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Daniel Casey, Jerry Coyne, Michael Bonatucci and others
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Piazza and James Piazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
