Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
TOMLINSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOES 1 through 23, MELANIE TOMLINSON, KATHRYN GREENLEE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, SHAHID BAKERI INDUSTRIAL GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HAMMONS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv02518
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BUSBY, ANDRIA HARRIS, TASHIA EVANS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
CHRISTIE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2019cv01289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN NAGEL, SANDRA OLIVIA BOUSE, WILLIAM CHRISTIAN NEVINS and others
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARK III v. SWIFT et al
as 1:2019cv01010
Defendant:
TYLER DEVER, THE FREE BEACON, JAMES DAMORE and others
Plaintiff:
WILFRED MICHAEL STARK III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CORTEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, SANDY KENNEDY, MONUMENT SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00596
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY PATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. J&G TREJO ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01950
Defendant:
J&G TREJO ENTERPRISES, INC., JOSE LUIS TREJO, GABRIELA TREJO and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
