Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Copeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03445
Plaintiff:
Rachael Copeland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Copeland v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02021
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce E Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv06374
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Joyce Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv01638
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Marquita Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv01324
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Maria Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00438
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03841
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Perry Copeland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Donahue et al
as 5:2012cv00541
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
Patric R. Donahue, Thurgood Marshall, Jr., Douglas A. Tulino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copeland et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22360
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Copeland and Robert Copeland
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
