Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Davila v. Dennis II et al
as 4:2023cv02534
Plaintiff:
Andrea Gonzales Davila
Defendant:
Aloysius Parone Dennis II and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Davila v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Davila
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Davila v. 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Davila and Mary Louise G. Davila
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. and 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Galvan et al v. Autotransportes Varela Davila de Reynosa S.A. de C.V. et al
as 4:2021cv03783
Plaintiff:
Roberto Galvan and Jose de Jesus Maldonado
Defendant:
Autotransportes Varela Davila de Reynosa S.A. de C.V., VD International Trucking, LLC and Ismael Bartolo Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert Davila
Defendant:
Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC and Golden Nugget Lake Charles Hotel & Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila v. Williams
as 2:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Samantha Davila
Defendant:
Jordon P. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ritz v. Davila et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Mario E Davila and The United States
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ritz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Davila v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2020cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davila
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davila v. Garnet
as 1:2020cv00111
Plaintiff:
Julia Davila
Defendant:
Judy Boe Garnet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Davila
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
