Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bagnall v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bagnall
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc, Phillip Barnes and Kings River Outdoors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DeBoer et al v. 3M Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01059
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dick DeBoer, Frank Huchro, Charles Robert Hudler and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jimmie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gray v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Marion Jermaine Gray
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henderson v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00345
Plaintiff:
Charles Henderson
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc, Telstra, and Telstra Ventures Group, Alphabet Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Michael Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Dick et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dick , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dick et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00710
Plaintiff:
Linda Dick , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
