Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TOPKA v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01438
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TOPKA
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HICKS et al v. THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
BILL HICKS and MARY HICKS
Defendant:
THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHECKENBACH v. GILLESPIE et al
as 2:2015cv03527
Plaintiff:
CARMEN SCHECKENBACH
Defendant:
WINDFIELD GILLESPIE, TOSHIEEDA GILLESPIE and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BROWN v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv03197
Plaintiff:
KIA BROWN
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TYLER v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
MARK TYLER
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
AMODEI v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06060
Plaintiff:
CAROL AMODEI
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TILLMAN v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03260
Plaintiff:
HERBERT TILLMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION , COUNTY OF DELAWARE and BOROUGH OF MARCUS HOOK MUNICIPAL BUILDING
Cross_claimant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
BOROUGH OF MARCUS HOOK MUNICIPAL BUILDING and COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BALDWIN et al v. AQUA AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02841
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BALDWIN and ROCHELLE BALDWIN
Defendant:
AQUA AMERICA, INC. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
AQUA AMERICA, INC. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and AQUA AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
