Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Morgan v. Bunker Hill Community College
as 1:2024cv10054
Plaintiff:
Destiny Morgan
Defendant:
Bunker Hill Community College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hill v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12701
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Hill
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hills et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2023cv12605
Plaintiff:
Wallis Hills and Thomas D Hills
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benton-Hill v. The University of Rochester
as 1:2023cv12601
Plaintiff:
Natasha Benton-Hill
Defendant:
The University of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hill v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12407
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hill
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Major et al v. Drum Hill Autos, Inc.
as 1:2023cv11624
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Major and Darlene Major
Defendant:
Drum Hill Autos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Strawberry Hill Acton Realty Trust v. 3M Company, et al.
as 1:2023cv11487
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technology Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Strawberry Hill Acton Realty Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hill v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv10763
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Hill
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Productions SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10544
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hill
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien Ltd., Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beaugard v. Pine Hill House, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11400
Plaintiff:
Camille Beaugard
Defendant:
Pine Hill House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
