Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Holcombe v. Taco Bell Corp. et al
as 6:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
John Holcombe
Defendant:
Taco Bell Corp., Taco Bell Lugoff, LLC, Taco Bell of America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Frank Douglas Hall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Douglas Hall, Christopher Alphonse Jones, Dennis Edward Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Holcombe v. Helena Chemical Co
as 2:2015cv02852
Plaintiff:
Jody Holcombe
Defendant:
Helena Chemical Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 7:2008cv03736
Plaintiff:
Boyd Holcomb and Charlotte B Holcomb
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Holcombe v. Wal-Mart Supercenter Store
as 6:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Carolyn R Holcombe
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Supercenter Store and Wal-Mart Supercenter Store
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Holcombe v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2007cv04169
Plaintiff:
Nancy Holcombe
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Holcomb et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2007cv01535
Plaintiff:
James Wardon Holcomb and Nealie M Holcomb
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
