Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hartman v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
William Hartman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartman v. Sackler et al
as 1:2021op45117
Plaintiff:
Paul Hartman
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, David Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt and others
Bealer et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01839
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gibson, Steven Rhoades, Jill Gibson and others
Defendant:
Warner Lambert Company, LLC, Parke, Davis & Co., Warner Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03619
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frances Hartman and Ben Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01407
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hartman
Defendant:
Kia Motors America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00348
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristoph Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augst et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Augst , Jody Bauer , Amanda Ayres and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman v. Durrani, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Adam Hartman
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman et al v. BHTT Entertainment, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
Russell Hartman and Kathie Hartman
Defendant:
BHTT Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hartman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23987
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Hartman and Dennis Hartman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
