Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WALKER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44754
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
King et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02882
Plaintiff:
Starlett M. King , Arthur P. Acevedo , Tiffany S. James and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WALKER v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv63900
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87930
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER and JUDY WALKER
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86572
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75043
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER and JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62257
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER, JAMES E. WALKER, SHARON A. WALKER and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WALKER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66712
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WALKER and JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
