Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shelton v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Julius Shelton
Defendant:
John Doe and Rat Catcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHOUSE et al v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, LLC
as 2:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Elisha Shouse and Julius Shouse
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, LLC and FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, LLC doing business as FAMILY DOLLAR #11223
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWIE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01746
Plaintiff:
JULIUS HOWIE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04891
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
JULIUS HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
REA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03900
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JULIUS A. REA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brazzel v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01508
Plaintiff:
Julius Brazzel
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adewunmi et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00944
Plaintiff:
Julius Adewunmi and Elin Adewunmi
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Julius Smith and Carletta Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JULIUS v. HORIZON HOUSE
as 1:2008cv01079
Plaintiff:
JULIUS
Defendant:
HORIZON HOUSE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JULIUS v. L.A. GREYHOUND
as 1:2008cv01075
Plaintiff:
JULIUS
Defendant:
L.A. GREYHOUND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
