Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Wick, et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Duane Wick and Kathy Gibson Wick
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowlin et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00105
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kathy Bowlin and James Bowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00135
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dennis Nelson and Kathy Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stasny v. J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kathy P. Stasny
Defendant:
J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 3:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thompson
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Robbie Johnson
Defendant:
Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC , Jane Doe and Kathy Seznack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson v. Huddleston et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kathy Dickinson
Defendant:
Brad Huddleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen, IV v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00774
Plaintiff:
Leigh B. Allen, IV
Defendant:
Steve Cox, Mark Mancini, Kathy Mancini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Cajun Operating Company et al
as 3:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Kathy F. Smith and Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1-10, Fris Chkn and Cajun Operating Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Kathy Scott
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
