Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bodden v. Town of Bel Air et al
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Levi M Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Bel Air, Bel Air Police Department, Officer Logan F. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Logan v. Oxygen Media, LLC
as 8:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Logan
Defendant:
Oxygen Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Marks v. Five Star Power Sports LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03499
Plaintiff:
Garrett Logan Marks
Defendant:
Five Star Power Sports LLC and Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. Burlington Coat Factory of Maryland, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01165
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Logan
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory of Maryland, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Akintokun, et al.
as 1:2015cv03510
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Holmes
Defendant:
Logan O. Akintokun and Shelley L. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Logan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2013cv01673
Plaintiff:
Marlo Logan
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Vennes et al v. Roberts
as 1:2012cv01613
Plaintiff:
Judith Vennes and Sean C. Logan
Defendant:
Tara Marcelle Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 8:2011cv01075
Plaintiff:
Allen Logan
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company and Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products N.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Logan et al v. Leroy et al
as 1:2010cv01456
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Logan, William E. Logan and Ashley Kay Logan
Defendant:
David Alexander Faust Leroy, Diane Anderson and Mark Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Logan v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03138
Plaintiff:
Ruth Logan
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
