Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rodger et al v. Elmhurst Operator, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lori Rodger and Lisa Rohelia
Defendant:
Elmhurst Operator, LLC d/b/a Elmhurst Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center, Marquis Health Consulting Services lLC, Cedarbridge Care Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Whitney v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lori K. Whitney
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03751
Plaintiff:
Lori Green
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Scott et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03492
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott and Lori Scott
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blum-Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03389
Plaintiff:
Lori Blum-Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03301
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Foster
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Berg et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02842
Plaintiff:
Bruce Berg and Lori Berg
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Becker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02757
Plaintiff:
Lori Becker, Lori Becker, Lori Becker and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KELLIE et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02562
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KELLIE and LORI KELLIE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Bard Devices, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02209
Plaintiff:
Lori J. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
