Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WATSON et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67045
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRAIG WATSON and BESSIE M. WATSON
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON et al v. WATERS
as 5:2011cv02368
Plaintiff:
DAWN M. WATSON and JORGE L. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
VANESSA N. WATERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON v. A.C. AND S., INC. ET AL
as 2:2010cv64207
Plaintiff:
LUGENE M. WATSON and ESTELLE WATSON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF ERIC L. GUZIK et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2009cv01071
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ERIC L. GUZIK, CAROL L. GUZIK and TERESSA M. WATSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ESTATE OF ERIC L. GUZIK et al v. MAHMUD et al
as 2:2009cv00657
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ERIC L. GUZIK, CAROL L. GUZIK, ANTHONY GUZIK and others
Defendant:
RASHIDA MAHMUD, STERLING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WATSON v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61112
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. WATSON
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2007cv02596
Plaintiff:
ETHEL M. WATSON and JAMES A. WATSON, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WATSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62216
Plaintiff:
FRED M. WATSON, FRED M. WATSON and FRED M. WATSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
