Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LeCoq v. Chappaquiddick Ferry, Inc.
as 1:2020cv11888
Plaintiff:
Madeline LeCoq
Defendant:
Chappaquiddick Ferry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Madeline Claffey v Officemax North America, Inc.
as 4:2017cv40119
Plaintiff:
Madeline Claffey
Defendant:
Officemax North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen v. Albanese et al
as 3:2015cv30003
Plaintiff:
Madeline B Cohen
Defendant:
Peter A. Albanese and Connecticut Valley Oral Surgery Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Varner v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12360
Plaintiff:
Della A. Varner , Malinda A. Osborn , Beverly J. Yocum and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Covidien, Inc., Covidien, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojas v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv10671
Plaintiff:
Madeline Rojas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bragar v. Andreani
as 1:2011cv12204
Plaintiff:
Madeline Bragar
Defendant:
Marc Andreani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sigsbury et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10878
Plaintiff:
William Sigsbury and Madeline Sigsbury
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv10152
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO , STEPHEN FECHO , ANDREA ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belinskas et al v. AJ Weigand Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12190
Plaintiff:
James P. Belinskas and Madeline Belinskas
Defendant:
AJ Weigand Inc. and MIchael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Belinskas et al v. AJ Weigand Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv12190
Plaintiff:
James P. Belinskas and Madeline Belinskas
Defendant:
AJ Weigand Inc. and Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
