Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MATHIS v. MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
OLAMAE MATHIS
Defendant:
MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MATHIS v. GERGIS et al
as 2:2023cv05174
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
PIERRE GERGIS and CHALLENGER MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BENDER-MATHIS v. THE CITY OF ERIE
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
SHARHEA BENDER-MATHIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ERIE, JOSEPH SCHMEMBER, DAN SPINARZY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIS v. CALLES et al
as 2:2022cv04426
Plaintiff:
ANTAWINE MATHIS
Defendant:
JORGE CALLES, G CALLES TRANSPORT, LLC and WIZARD TRANSPORT, INC. doing business as WIZARD TRANSPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MATHIS et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MATHIS and JOYCE MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIS v. SENTRY EQUIPMENT & ERECTORS
as 2:2020cv01037
Defendant:
SENTRY EQUIPMENT & ERECTORS
Plaintiff:
ROGER MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIS v. SKA FABRICATING, LLC
as 2:2019cv04260
Plaintiff:
ROGER MATHIS
Defendant:
SKA FABRICATING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLDRICH et al v. MERLIN LAW GROUP, P.A. et al
as 5:2018cv00619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. SOLDRICH and JO-ELLEN JACOBUS
Defendant:
MERLIN LAW GROUP, P.A. and CHARLES R. MATHIS, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIS et al v. PATHMARK STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATHIS and PATRICIA MATHIS
Defendant:
PATHMARK STORES, INC. and THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIS v. KFC U.S. PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03959
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MATHIS
Defendant:
KFC U.S. PROPERTIES, INC. and KFC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
