Cases 1 - 10 of 203
DIMARCO v. MAY et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
RICKY DIMARCO
Defendant:
METZLER BROTHERS INC doing business as METZLER BROTHERS TRANSPORT INC and ELMER MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ALIE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03666
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MAI ALIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mays v. Rattigan et al
as 3:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Keri Mays
Defendant:
Rattigan Trucking LLC and Dadrian Rattigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ROSS et al v. ROSS et al
as 2:2023cv01864
Plaintiff:
RYAN V. ROSS and CHELSEA STUCK
Defendant:
EMILY MAY ROSS, ELIZABETH J. MCCALL, ESQUIRE and BONONI & COMPANY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MAYS v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01828
Plaintiff:
NAFEESAH MAYS
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MEYERS et al v. MAY et al
as 5:2020cv01781
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (11-20), GEORGINE MAY, JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
MARY MEYERS and CHARLES MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01268
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 and ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04015
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
NANCY MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY et al v. BROWNING
as 2:2019cv03621
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MAY and ARTHUR MAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GHIMIRE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 5:2019cv02212
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
KAMALA MAY GHIMIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
