Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NOBLE v. GALELLA, D.D.S. et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
MARCIA NOBLE
Defendant:
STEVE GALELLA, D.D.S., ORTHOMATRIX CORP., INC., ALSO D/B/A FACIAL BEAUTY INSTITUTE AND D/B/A ORTHOLOGIC and JOHN'S DENTAL LABORATORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLLAND et al v. NOBLE TRANSPORT LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
GARRETT HOLLAND and TRINITY BRADY
Defendant:
NOBLE TRANSPORT LLC and AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STEWART v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06447
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL NOBLE STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NOBLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
NOBLE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03612
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LEE NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOBLE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01483
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SHERRIE NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
NOBLE et al v. HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, N.A., INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Defendant:
HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, N.A., INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY NOBLE and RITA NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lamb et al v Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 3:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Noble L Lamb and Kathleen S Lamb
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WHITE v. NOBLE
as 4:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
LEE WHITE
Defendant:
CLARENCE NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
