Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sherfield v. Gibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Noble DeAngelo Sherfield
Defendant:
Anthony Gibbs, Mike Lanoy, Katlin Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atoka County Board of County Commissioners et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00747
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Atoka County Board of County Commissioners, Beckham County Board of County Commissioners, Caddo County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Board of County Commissioners of Noble County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 5:2019cv01127
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Noble County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cain et al v. Noble Energy Inc
as 5:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Christopher F Cain , Shane Higginbotham , Ernie Sessums and others
Defendant:
Noble Energy Inc
Third_party_defendant:
Robbie Shane Griffin , High Sierra Water Services Mid-Continent LLC, Quadco Oil Tools and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Noble Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Griffin et al v. Noble Energy Inc
as 5:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Robbie Shane Griffin, Clydie Griffin and Tabetha Griffin
Defendant:
Noble Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griffin et al v. Noble Energy Inc
as 5:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
Robbie Shane Griffin, Clydie Griffin and Tabetha Griffin
Defendant:
Noble Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nobles et al v. All Freight Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00277
Plaintiff:
Nacobra Nobles, Nacobra Nobles, Curtis Mathis and others
Defendant:
All Freight Services, Inc., All Freight Services, Inc., Ronald Kumm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
