Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Curtis v. Progressive Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv02062
Plaintiff:
Devante Curtis
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and Hennepin County Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Nguyen v. Harris et al
as 1:2023cv05658
Plaintiff:
Hong Manh Nguyen
Defendant:
Charelle Latunya Harris and Progressive Insurance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Saunds v. Washington et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Saunds
Defendant:
Roderick L. Washington, Jim Bender, Inc., Rasuljon Abdunazarov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Nails v. Progressive Insurance et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and Gary Weil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Hull v. Aga et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Wendell Hull
Cross Defendant:
Tesfa Aga and Dhab LLC
Defendant:
Amguard Insurance Company
Cross Claimant:
Progressive Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
BAGGETT et al v. GREGORY et al
as 4:2018cv00168
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BAGGETT, A B and PRESTON BAGGETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bellaire v. Pratt
as 2:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Laura Bellaire and Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles Douglas Pratt and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alberto v. Progressive Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
Oscar A. Alberto
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company and Jeremy C. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gross v. Monroe et al
as 5:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Daisey Gross and Robert Gross
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Monroe and Progressive Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
