Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Prater v. Ecolab, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv01391
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc. and Does 1-100 Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Candice Prater
Prater v. Ecolab, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv01123
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Prater
Prater v. Ecolab, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv01124
Plaintiff:
Ashley Prater
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc. and Does 1-100 inclusive
Prater v. Ecolab, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv01020
Plaintiff:
Raven Prater
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc. and Does 1-100 inclusive
Prater v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04870
Plaintiff:
Doris Prater
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03552
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington , Josephine Campbell , Jeffrey Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prater et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01800
Plaintiff:
Janet Lynn Prater and Charles Edward Prater, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prater v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv02891
Plaintiff:
Margaret Prater
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho McNeil Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Reasearch & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boles et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06001
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Prater et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05973
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Prater and Vivian M. Prater
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
