Torts - Injury Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rawlings v. NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02111
Plaintiff: Janet Rawlings
Defendant: NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAWLS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04244
Plaintiff: BARBARA RAWLS
Defendant: MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWLINGS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2020cv02009
Plaintiff: THERESA RAWLINGS
Defendant: AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWLS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2018cv05039
Plaintiff: RICKY RAWLS
Defendant: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH v. BUSH et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH
Defendant: GEORGE W. BUSH, MARK SULLIVAN, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
RAWLING v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43453
Plaintiff: RAYMOND A. RAWLING
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RAWLS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38687
Plaintiff: EDWARD C. RAWLS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RAWLS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38688
Plaintiff: JEAN B RAWLS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RAWLS v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61288
Plaintiff: CHARLIE RAWLS
Defendant: NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02421
Plaintiff: JAMES RAWL, JR
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?