Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVIS-LEWIS et al v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
KARMEN DAVIS-LEWIS and ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
WALMART INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP trading and doing business as WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LEWIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04259
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv31173
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2010cv68692
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS and COSTELLA LEWIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , FIBREBOARD CORP. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARR v. ELK ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOWARD STARR
Defendant:
ELK ASSOCIATES, SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH, CHARLES HABERBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
YOUNG v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS YOUNG
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CAIN v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65854
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS CAIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, THE BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NAYLOR et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv61824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS NAYLOR, ROBERT LEWIS NAYLOR, ROBERT LEWIS NAYLOR and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
