Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Knight et al v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv05738
Plaintiff:
Heather Knight, Adelaide Moore and Craig Moore
Defendant:
Consumers County Mutual Insurance Company, You Rong Michael Leung and Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Sang v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv10557
Defendant:
New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Wildlife Conservation Society, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
GUI RONG SANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huang v. Minghui.org
as 19-2928
Defendant / Appellee:
Mid-USA Falun Dafa Association, Feng Yuan, Minghui.org and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Renxiong Huang
Acosta et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11810
Plaintiff:
Kenny Tin, So Chun Kwong, Yue Qin Lu Chen and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Amato et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11849
Plaintiff:
James Quinlivan, Susan DeMaio, Jimmie Lee Boyles and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
RAN et al v. ALACHUA COUNTY FIRE RESCUSE et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONG RAN and DEJING SU
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY FIRE RESCUSE and NORTH FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huang v. Minghui.org et al
as 1:2017cv05582
Plaintiff:
Renxiong Huang
Defendant:
Minghui.org, Zhengjian.org, Eastern US Buddhas Study Falun Dafa Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rong Li v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 17-55168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONG DONG LI
Defendant - Appellee:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Rong Li v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 14-55956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONG DONG LI
Defendant - Appellee:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Saucier v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv01567
Plaintiff:
Webster J Saucier
Defendant:
USA, Karen Saucier McPherson, Rong Yi Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
