Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ROLLINS-ALLEN v. NORTHERN CLEARING INC et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
SHANNON ROLLINS-ALLEN
Defendant:
NORTHERN CLEARING INC and CURTIS W STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOURNIER v. GREENHEAD LOBSTER LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
JOLENE FOURNIER
Defendant:
GREENHEAD LOBSTER LLC, OUTNUMBERED INC and STEPHEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RATCLIFFE v. BRP US INC et al
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION, TIDD'S SPORT SHOP INC and BRP US INC
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J RATCLIFFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOSTORA v. PAWLIN et al
as 1:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KOSTORA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PAWLIN and JB HUNT TRANSPORT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
WALLACE v. COOKE AQUACULTURE USA INC et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WALLACE, SR
Defendant:
COOKE AQUACULTURE USA INC and TRUE NORTH SALMON US INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HEINEMANN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
THEODORE HEINEMANN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY GUARD ON DUTY 09/08/2016, JOAN LOGAN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOONAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
SHANE NOONAN
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY, MAURICE OUELLETTE, JAY BONDAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. ZIMMER INC et al
as 1:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODRICH v. SHEEHAN, ESQ et al
as 2:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN GOODRICH
Defendant:
MICHAEL L SHEEHAN, ESQ and PRETI FLAHERTY BELIVEAU & PACHIOS CHARTERED LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CEFALO et al v. MITCHELL
as 2:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CEFALO and MAUREEN RIPLEY
Defendant:
VICTORIA MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
