Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LUSK et al v. A.B. BOYD CO. et al
as 2:2009cv65684
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR, INC., YARWAY CORPORATION, ITT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
HELEN C. LUSK and JOHN LUSK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUSK et al v. A.B. BOYD CO. et al
as 2:2009cv63322
Plaintiff:
JOHN LUSK, JOHN LUSK, JOHN LUSK and others
Defendant:
A.B. BOYD CO., A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BRODERICK et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62886
Defendant:
DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO, SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES and others
Plaintiff:
ENID GILBERT, ARLO BRODERICK, STEVEN BRODERICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORTHWAY et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62885
Defendant:
DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO, SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET NORTHWAY and DONALD NORTHWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VIDA v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62874
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT, UNION CARBIDE CORP., ALTA BUILDING MATERIAL CO. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
URAM v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62742
Defendant:
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC, PLANT INSULATION CO., CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRONWORKS and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA A. URAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOOK v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62739
Defendant:
DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC, PLANT INSULATION CO. and others
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS BOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Lusk et al v. A.B. Boyd Co. et al
as 2:2008cv07548
Plaintiff:
John Lusk, John Lusk, John Lusk and others
Defendant:
A.B. Boyd Co., A. O. Smith Corporation, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
