Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Barnett v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Defendant:
State of Texas, Western District of Texas In Austin, Travis County Commissioners Court and others
Plaintiff:
Caroline Sue Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Yan v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00579
Defendant:
Lori L. Deangelis, William Albert Pigg, Panopyra PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of Texas, the Municipality of the City of Angleton v. Howard
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, the Municipality of the City of Angleton
Defendant:
Inga-Antine Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weah v. Estancia Villas
as 24-50451
Defendant:
State of Texas and Estancia Villas, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Allen Weah
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1884
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, RONALD J. STRECK and STATE OF TEXAS
Weah v. State of Texas
as 5:2024cv00505
Defendant:
State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Allen Weah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weah v. Estancia Villas LLC
as 5:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Allen Weah
Defendant:
Estancia Villas LLC and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Garrett v. State of Texas, Harris County
as 4:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Trenton Charles Garrett
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. STRECK, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 23-3035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. STRECK
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
