Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mendelson et al v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02283
Plaintiff:
Sidney Mendelson and Andrea Mendelson
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Williams-Sonoma Direct, Inc., Williams-Sonoma Retail Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roushey v. Williams-Sonoma Stores Inc
as 3:2020cv03509
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores Inc doing business as Pottery Barn
Plaintiff:
Terry Roushey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphrey v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 4:2019cv03114
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Naomi Murphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Khalik v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02948
Plaintiff:
Gina Khalik
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., Pottery Barn Kids and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC.
as 0:2018cv60549
Plaintiff:
NIKOLINA JONES and KENTON S JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Opare v. Williams-Sonoma Stores Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
William Opare
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores Inc and K Power Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paula Perez-Brito, et al v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 17-12082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULA C. PEREZ-BRITO and CARLOS A. BRITO
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC., d.b.a. Pottery Barn Kids
Berosh v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 1:2016cv23119
Plaintiff:
Ellen Berosh
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
E.C. v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00285
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC. d/b/a "POTTERY BARN"
as 0:2016cv60736
Plaintiff:
NIKOLINA JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
