Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brown v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv09988
Plaintiff:
Melissa Winston Brown
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Winston-Brown v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81330
Defendant:
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Hikma Pharmaceuticals International, Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Winston-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53056
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WINSTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
June Gosnell, et al v. Moore Handley
as 13-14625
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JUNE V. GOSNELL, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Grady Jackson Gosnell, deceased, MARY N. RAMSEY, as Personal Representative for the Estate of James Ramsey, deceased, FRANCES HORTON, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Harold Edward Horton, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MOORE HANDLEY, INC.
Royal Brown v. Kimberly-Clark Corp
as 10-2628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROYAL WINSTON BROWN
Defendant - Appellant:
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
JORDAN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73275
Plaintiff:
OLEN LAVOYN JORDAN, CLARENCE JACKSON ALLDREDGE, EUNICE HYDE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LANDY DELMAR ALDRIDGE and ROOSEVELT ALTOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROWN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64842
Plaintiff:
ROYAL WINSTON BROWN
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
