Cases 21 - 30 of 64
The DHA Corporation v. Frutarom USA Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03681
Plaintiff:
The DHA Corporation
Defendant:
Frutarom USA Inc., Frutarom Industries Ltd., Craig Hagelin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kraus USA, Inc. v. American Carpet Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Kraus USA, Inc.
Defendant:
American Carpet Group, Inc. and Erik Krause
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
LogiTrans Express, LLC v. Chase Bank USA, National Association
as 1:2015cv02841
Plaintiff:
LogiTrans Express, LLC
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byrd et al v. Drive Electric, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Richard Byrd and Amanda Byrd
Defendant:
Drive Electric, LLC, Drive Electric USA, LLC, Zone Electric Car, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton et al v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
William C. Walton
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. , The Bank of New York Company, N.A., Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Merchant Ivory Productions (USA), Inc. et al v. Donaldson
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Merchant Ivory Productions (USA), Inc. and James Ivory
Defendant:
John Gilbert Donaldson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lunn v. Steve Rayman Chevrolet, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04411
Plaintiff:
Loretha Lunn
Defendant:
Steve Rayman Chevrolet, LLC and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Versacold USA, Inc. v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04329
Plaintiff:
Versacold USA, Inc.
Defendant:
OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Groom v. Capital One Bank (USA), NA et al
as 3:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
John K. Groom
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Concrete Designs & Resurfacing LLC, CDR, LLC and others
Ricks et al v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02619
Plaintiff:
Scott Ricks , Metal Works, Inc. and Metal Works of Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Skanska USA Building, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
