Cases 31 - 40 of 743
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02731
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MORNING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MORNING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ALLSTATE, ASURION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARCO, INC. v. VENTO et al
as 1:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
HARCO, INC.
Defendant:
ROELL VENTO, LANI ESPARZA, REVOLVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AARON GUY DURDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ARAGONE v. PIERRE FABRE USA INC.
as 1:2023cv02308
Plaintiff:
MARIA ARAGONE
Defendant:
PIERRE FABRE USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
HALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv02285
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2023cv02287
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. SHRENSKY
as 1:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
Lewis F Shrensky and LEWIS F. SHRENSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
