Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Northcliffe Media Limited v. Doe
as 3:2012cv03536
Plaintiff:
Northcliffe Media Limited
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mood Media Corporation v. Doe
as 5:2012cv01833
Plaintiff:
Mood Media Corporation
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belvedere v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al
as 3:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
Mark Belvedere
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, FA , Chase Home Finance LLC , JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sunzi et al v. Troy Rodarmel et al
as 8:2012cv00214
Defendant:
Henry Adamany Jr, Denny Barge, Morton Bauchman and others
Plaintiff:
Chantal Barrat, Vincent Lelard and Sunzi
Kenneth Irvin Counce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv01894
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Irvin Counce
Defendant:
John Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Sanchez and others
Executive Consultative Services Inc et al v. Gary Bernstein et al
as 8:2011cv01432
Defendant:
Gary Bernstein, DHMS LCC, Frank Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Elitist Inc, Executive Consultative Services Inc, Peggy Husted and others
Fromm v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv02074
Plaintiff:
Roger M. Fromm
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Customs and Border Protection , United States Border Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
VARELA et al v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT OF AMERICA, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01922
Plaintiff:
JOANA CORTICEIRO and MARTIN VARELA
Defendant:
Sony Computer Entertainment of America, LLC, Sony Network Entertainment International, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alicia Searls v. Pom Wonderful, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv09868
Defendant:
John Does, Pom Wonderful, LLC, Lynda Rae Resnick and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Searls
DJB, Inc. v. Doe
as 3:2010cv03590
Plaintiff:
DJB, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
