Cases 71 - 80 of 196
Mitchell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al.
as 2:2015cv06613
Plaintiff:
Lola Mitchell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2015cv06613
Plaintiff:
Lola Mitchell
631) 261-6411 (fax:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mullins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08946
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tanya Thompson Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04579
Plaintiff:
Eugene and Victoria Richard
Defendant:
Rockline Industries and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Texas Farmers Insurance Company as Subrogee of Sam Washburn v. Deere & Company et al
as 6:2015cv00230
512) 472-0721 (fax:
Deere & Company
Plaintiff:
Texas Farmers Insurance Company as Subrogee of Sam Washburn
214) 672-2307 (fax:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mack v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2015cv04411
Plaintiff:
Charles Mack
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Cathy Johnson and Randal Johnson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lugo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05442
Plaintiff:
Rosalynd Lugo
Defendant:
Wal-mart Stores, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Williams et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05438
Plaintiff:
Louise Williams and Maria Valdez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wal-mart Stores, Inc. and NBTY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05443
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Lee
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
