Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ohan v. Duruhesie et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Festus O. Ohan
Defendant:
Chimezie C. Duruhesie, Chigbo M. Eze, Rose N. Emegwa and others
Cobia v. Arizona State Board of Nursing et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
April Cobia
Defendant:
Arizona State Board of Nursing, Jo Elizabeth Ridenour, Valerie Jean Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartlett et al v. Pulhum et al
as 3:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Alan M. Bartlett, U.S. Disabled Veterans, LLC. and U.S. Handicapped/Disadvantaged Services, LLC.
Defendant:
Angie Pulhum, Jasmine M. Jackson, Stephanie Rae Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Bartlett et al v. DeBorsantos-Garcia et al
as 3:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Alan M. Bartlett, U.S. Disabled Veterans, LLC. and U.S. Handicapped/Disadvantaged Services, LLC.
Defendant:
Chris DeBorsantos-Garcia, Deborah DeBorsantos, Michael Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Bartlett et al v. Zamora et al
as 3:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Alan M. Bartlett, US Disabled Veterans, LLC and US Handicapped/Disadvantaged Services, LLC.
Defendant:
Cathy Zamora, Robyn Michelle Mayhan, Kent E. Raley and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Samson Tug and Barge Company, Inc. v. Koziol et al
as 3:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Samson Tug and Barge Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy J. Koziol and Brett M. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GCI Communication Corp. v. Seabulk Tankers, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
GCI Communication Corp. and GCI Communication Corp.
Defendant:
Seabulk Tankers, Inc. and M/V Seabulk Pride, Official No. 1072068
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Voke v. Bleckmann et al
as 3:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Voke and Edward M. Voke
Defendant:
Gilbert A. Bleckmann, Susan J. Bleckmann, Dion's Yacht Yard Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
