Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Molly Brown, et al v. Kellogg Company
as 22-15658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOLLY BROWN, ADINA RINGLER and CHRISTIAN LEMUS
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLOGG COMPANY
Brown et al v. Kellogg Company
as 3:2021cv07388
Plaintiff:
Molly Brown, Adina Ringler and Christian Lemus
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seaman et al v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2020cv05520
Plaintiff:
Kyle Corbin and Barbara Seaman
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Aaronson et. al. v. Kellogg Company
as 2:2018cv05616
Plaintiff:
Joseph McSweeney, John Castles, LD Cookie Corp. and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mantikas v. Kellogg Company
as 17-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kristen Mantikas, Kristin Burns and Linda Castle, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Kellogg Company
Mantikas et al v. Kellogg Company
as 2:2016cv02552
Plaintiff:
Kristin Burns, Linda Castle and Kristen Mantikas
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patrick Sweeney v. Kellogg Company, et al
as 16-10854
Interested Party - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLOGG COMPANY and THE KASHI COMPANY
:
LAURA EGGNATZ, a.k.a. Laura Gabbamonte and KATRINA GARCIA, Miami-Dade County, Miami, FL
Mohamed v. Kellogg Company et al
as 3:2014cv02449
Plaintiff:
Tasneem L. Mohamed
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gabbamonte et al v. The Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2012cv21678
Plaintiff:
Laura Gabbamonte and Katrina Garcia
Defendant:
The Kellogg Company and Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Bates v. Kashi Company et al
as 3:2011cv01967
Plaintiff:
Michael Bates
Defendant:
Kashi Company, Kellogg Company, David Denholm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
