Cases 91 - 100 of 121
Babbs-Smith v. Northland Village Apartments
as 2:2010cv02623
Plaintiff:
Regene Janee Babbs-Smith
Defendant:
Northland Village Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reedy et al v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2010cv03155
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Reedy , Todd Deal , Grant Nixon and others
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cook v. Olathe Health System, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02133
Plaintiff:
Samantha Cook
Defendant:
Olathe Health System, Inc., Melissa Davenport, Kellie Moulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Blundell et al
as 2:2010cv02110
Plaintiff:
Hazel Mae Smith
Defendant:
William C. Blundell and Labette County, Kansas Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
