Cases 101 - 110 of 209
Gonzalez v. Thomas J. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Agustin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart , County of Cook, The, Superintendent Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robert Anderson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-4238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, FRANK FITE, Correctional Officer and others
Milan Brown v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILAN J. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Carmen Consolino v. Brian Towne, et al
as 16-3681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN A. CONSOLINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN TOWNE, THOMAS J. DART and ROBERT EGAN
Insanun v. Dart
as 1:2016cv09657
Plaintiff:
Mujaani Insanun
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elena Villarreal, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-3623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELENA VILLARREAL and DESPINA ATSAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Corporation and Body Politic
Ruben Sanchez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipality, LUIS GARCIA, Officer, Star 16093, individually, THOMAS J. DART, Cook County Sheriff, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Freeman v. Dart, et al.
as 1:2016cv08187
Plaintiff:
Janet Cee Freeman
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Unknown Officer 1, Unknown Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Oruta, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-3169
Plaintiff:
BRIAN OTERO
Appellant:
LARRY ORUTA, objector
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
