Cases 101 - 110 of 6,744
Stroy v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Blanche Marie Stroy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Direct Express, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Destinee Jacklyn Carrillo
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Shane Flynn and Daniel Montoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cole v. Melloy Group
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
William Cole
Defendant:
Melloy and Melloy Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Askari v. Taj and Ark, LLC
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Syed Askari
Defendant:
Taj and Ark, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bustamante v. Eddy County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Jaime Aceves Bustamante
Defendant:
Eddy County Board of Commissioners, Billy Massingill, Edgar Aleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mendez et al v. Cano
as 1:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
Raymond F Mendez and Margaret A Mendez
Defendant:
Matt Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jaime Aceves Bustamante
Defendant:
Warden Billy Massingill, Sgt. Edgar Aleman, Cheyenne Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
